![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Presse – »The Greta Garbo Collection« (German Version) »The Greta Garbo Collection« |
![]() ![]() |
PrefaceColor! Color always was the essential component. Other criteria did matter. Quality, condition, proportion, history, practicality — all were important, but colors — shades of rose, salmon, pink and a mossy green — were paramount. In her home there was a riot of color everywhere. The works meshed and flowed in a wonderous explosion of enveloping hues that lifted the mood. Nothing was black or white. During the almost four decades when the New York apartment was her only home, she tried to create a harmonious setting where nothing jarred the senses. Always, continually, she sought out those with particular expertise in art, furniture and decorations. Many became her lifelong friends. She chose those objects which pleased her with slight regard for the current fashion. She was imaginative in combining them: the expensive and the more modest — a Renoir and a David Levine, the modern and the old — an Atlan and a Lemaire, the conservative and the daring — a Thierriat and a Jawlensky. Nothing was static. There was a plan, a logic, but within it, refinements and changes would occur. Sometimes a new color or a new artist would capture her, creating havoc until a new order would emerge. This is a very personal collection. It reflects totally one person’s taste, vision, preference. One day, some years ago, we were sitting in her living-room. “I love color,” she told me. “I want the room to sing. How can one not understand? With me it’s inborn, I just know. I didn’t have to learn it. This room is my creation and I think it’s pretty good. You must learn to trust yourself.’’ Gray Reisfield
|
What is your opinion about Greta Garbo? Write your thoughts to: redaktion@greta-garbo.de |
What is your opinion about Greta Garbo? Write your thoughts to: redaktion@greta-garbo.de |
|
A FriendshipI met Greta Garbo in 1947 at the house of John Gunther, to whom I was married a few months later. For me it was an amazing experience which I shall never forget. I thought it an unexpected bonus of life to be able to see at close range a person I so much admired. She was then, and is to me now someone who had given a superior dimension to moving pictures, when they were still, artistically, secondary to the theatre. She was the one actress who, above all others, seemed to me, and indeed to millions of people, to be the personification of romanticism and mysterious fascination. I came into John’s apartment, and there she was. Wonderfully beautiful, but she surprised mc by being perfectly simple, without the slightest pretension, affectation, or theatricality. Here was a human being, direct, gracious, and unforbidding. I felt shy in her presence, and said not a word, dazzled in observation. A collection of circumstances made us meet many times again, and two years later John and I, Miss G., George Schlee, and his wife Valentina also, became friends. Wc saw each other often and knew each other very well indeed. In the early l960s George Schlee died, and John died in 1970. G.G. and I, alone then, never lost affection and concern each for the other. How can I describe her? She was certainly the most beautiful woman I have ever seen, or even imagined. Her features were perfect, but the wonder of her beauty came from something within. There was a strange melancholy in her, which led one to believe that her marvelous face revealed the secrets of life — both the sorrows and joys. What was she like? She was Scandinavian, quite matter of fact, brave, accepting of disaster. Yet, on the other hand, she was a philosophic poet. I see her understanding of life and the world on two levels. Again, how can I describe her? She was elusive, oblique. She did not talk about her relationships — the important things that happened to her. She was totally secretive. She did not lie ever but would evade a direct question. Part of that can be explained by the fact that she was mercilessly pursued by the press and public. From the age of eighteen, everything she did or said eventually reached the newspapers or magazines, often in a distorted form. This naturally made her mistrustful of confidences, but I don’t think it was the real reason for her secrecy. It was her nature to be private. So profound was her sense of privacy that it went both ways. By that I mean that she was the most trustworthy person in the whole world. One could have told her anything and know absolutely that it would never, ever be revealed. I have not known anyone else who could be trusted to that degree. What a fascinating creature, many faceted. Profundity and mystery were almost contradicted by her gaiety, her delicious sense of humour, her sense of the ridiculous. She was responsive and funny, mocking and full of wit and jokes. A clownlike, childish delight in all sorts of things quite belies her public image, but it was a huge part of her. She was compassionate about people who were ill to an unusual degree. – She was never impolite or arrogant to anyone in my whole experience of her. – She hated violence. – She was absolutely modest about her fame. – Her artistic integrity and her aesthetic sense was always, right or wrong, very certain and clear. – She liked paintings. – She loved paintings. – She loved to be outdoors. What I miss personally, of course, is not the public figure, but a friend I loves and do not wish to be without, the person I want to speak to on the telephone about something as insignificant as the seagulls on my raft in Vermont. In the last years we used to talk about nothing in particular several times a week. I suppose that is what friendship is about, and G.G. was that sort of friend. Once she told me that some people on a plane had said landing, “When we saw that you were a passenger, we knew we would be safe.” “Can you imagine that?” G.G. said. Well, yes, I can imagine that. Another time in Paris, a young journalist came to see John in our room at the Hotel Parc Monceau. G.G. happened to be there and we introduced her, as was the custom, as Miss Brown. He didn’t recognize her, but the next day he asked John, “Who was that woman with you last night? It is someone I would like to know about. I thought about her after I went home.” What caused this power? I don’t really know, but it was not beauty or fame. There was some magic quality which ine rarely encounters in anyone in an entire lifetime. She was extraordinary.
Jane Gunther
|
What is your opinion about Greta Garbo? Write your thoughts to: redaktion@greta-garbo.de |
A Remembrance“I’ll wait for you forever; it really isn’t that long a time.” She could engender those feelings. She was a wonderful mixture of strength and sensitivity, wisdom and caring. She was full of humor, logic and practicality. Above all, she knew who she was. She was the best friend you could have. You could never be safer with anyone. She spoke to you with her eyes; they were magical, and you knew that she was even more beautiful on the inside. Stuart D. Saal, M.D. |
What is your opinion about Greta Garbo? Write your thoughts to: redaktion@greta-garbo.de |
The Garbo JawlenskysAs one looks at the Jawlenskys in the Garbo Collection, it is clear that her passion was for works painted between 1915 and 1918. Drawn from the three major series of paintings executed during these years, the Garbo paintings reflect the evolution of the artist’s interests and style during a critical period in his life. The colorful Blumenstilleben and the Variation Versonnen date from 1915, just after Jawlensky’s dramatic move to St. Prex, where he began a new life and new work. Both are particularly beautiful and harmonious examples of his series of still lifes and variations. Frau in St. Prex and Varation Vorwinter, 1916, clarify Jawlensky’s search for simpler and consequently more abstract forms in the series of inner landscapes. Frau in St. Prex is an interesting transitional work, painted just before Jawlensky began the series of Mystical Heads but also recalling his portraits before the War. The three Mystical Heads – Erde, Profil and Schwarze Lochen – bear witness to a new style, one in which, through simplified form, a strong yet subtle expressiveness is achieved. Together, the Garbo paintings represent a pivotal moment in Jawlensky’s life, a period when, after an inner crisis, he began to create something new, full of energy, hope and harmony. Angelica Jawlensky |
What is your opinion about Greta Garbo? Write your thoughts to: redaktion@greta-garbo.de |
|
What is your opinion about Greta Garbo? Write your thoughts to: redaktion@greta-garbo.de |
What is your opinion about Greta Garbo? Write your thoughts to: redaktion@greta-garbo.de |
|
What is your opinion about Greta Garbo? Write your thoughts to: redaktion@greta-garbo.de |
|
What is your opinion about Greta Garbo? Write your thoughts to: redaktion@greta-garbo.de |
![]() |
![]() |
Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Öl auf Leinwand aus dem Jahre 1897; »Confidence« (Format: 41 x 33cm) ; Versteigerungswert: US$ 2.000.000 - 3.000.000 | Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Öl auf Leinwand aus dem Jahre 1889; »Enfant assis en robe bleue (Portrait d'Edmond Renoir, jr.)« (Format: 65 x 54cm); Versteigerungswert: US$ 4.000.000 - 6.000.000 | Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Öl auf Leinwand aus dem Jahre 1909; »Leontine et Coco (Claude Renoir)« (Format: 54 x 64cm); Versteigerungswert: US$ 7.000.000 - 9.000.000 |
What is your opinion about Greta Garbo? Write your thoughts to: redaktion@greta-garbo.de |
![]() |
|
[Home] · [Chronologie] · [Garbo heute] · [Galerie] · [Presse] · [Meinungen] · [Sterne] · [Kontakt]
[Intro (2MB)] · [Franz Blei: Die göttliche Garbo] · [Stummfilme] · [Tonfilme] · [E-Mail]
[The Greta Garbo Collection] · [Interview with Greta Garbo (English)]
[Press Articles about Greta Garbo] · [True Story of Garbo’s Life by Sven-Hugo Borg]
www.greta-garbo.de = die größte private Fanseite über den schwedischen Hollywood-Star!
www.greta-garbo.de = The most complete web site about Greta Garbo!